John and Paul Signed Lp’s

[fab432]

Not sure I’d be forking out any $’s for these autographs. IMO they lack the expected flow of a natural signature. Any other thoughts?

[Cornelis]

Nonsense. Its hard to admit that you think you know your stuff but actually dont - right? Hurt ego?

On the photo provided they looked right. Stop making nonsensical excuses. Just admit that you had no clue where you were talking about

[michelle]

no longer up on tracks website,  Maybe someone has purchased it already

[Eric Keith Longo]

Can that be determined?

[Steve Cyrkin, Admin]

Servi and Cornelis,

Treat other members with respect here. Don't be arrogant or demeaning. 

It appears that the same person is using the Servi and Cornelis member accounts. Is that right?

[Invest_In_Graphs]

It's not okay to have an opinion? That's one person's opinion, I suppose. 

Were adverse opinions meant to dissuade potential bidders? Maybe. But that would serve people right - why should someone with years of knowledge hand over that knowledge to someone with less knowledge use it against the person with more knowledge? 

The winning bidder (Tracks, apparently) didn't give two craps about what anyone here said.  When you have confidence in your judgment,  you don't need to. 

[Cornelis]

It was not presented as an opinion. People pretended to have knowledge and called them "pattern forgeries" (laughable).

If you have no idea what your talking about its better to say nothing at all then typing that kind of BS.

[Eric Keith Longo]

Cornelis, name an individual or entity who has not made an error. If you think Tracks can't make a mistake (I don't say here) you'd be wrong.

[Invest_In_Graphs]

You make good points, which gives support to the idea that anyone willing to pay $6,000 or so felt they had a chance to win the lot, and chances of winning increase when there is less competition. 

[Cornelis]

What a weird comment Steve. Because both Servi (who I don't know) and I were right - we're the same?

Just admit defeat Napoleon

[Eric Keith Longo]

Indeed. It was enough last night Servi. Repetitive and unnecessarily antagonistic.

[Joe W.]

I think it's interesting that people would find it acceptable to intentionally deceive others to possibly prevent competition on an autograph. Did it work? How does it help the credibility of this site?

We all have our personal opinions which may be right or wrong. But, either way, they should be honest opinions. Intentional deception is always wrong. IMHO.

[Invest_In_Graphs]

Let's see if we can all agree that either:

1) Informed bidders didn't want competition, or 2) The naysayers were all wrong, despite being informed on Beatles autographs.

When it's broken down that way..........